Step 1
Submission intake
Students submit their work through a controlled university workflow so the assessment starts from the real submitted artifact, not a detached review copy.
How Veriviva moves from submitted work to reviewable evidence.
Veriviva helps universities run structured viva-style knowledge checks with AI-supported planning, academic approval, recorded interviews, transcripts, and a clearer evidence trail for final review.
Step by step
A workflow designed for understanding, not just submission checking.
Step 2
AI-supported question planning
Veriviva analyses the work and helps academics prepare structured viva-style questions designed to test understanding rather than just surface-level recall.
Step 3
Academic review and approval
Academics review, edit, and approve the questioning plan so human judgement stays in charge before any interview takes place.
Step 4
Recorded live interview
A live, recorded interview captures how well the student can explain, defend, and connect the work they submitted.
The final document alone is no longer enough.
Universities increasingly need a way to verify understanding around drafts, prompts, AI-assisted research, and submitted work without replacing academic judgement with a model output.
Academics keep the final decision.
Veriviva is designed to support reviewer preparation, structure the interview, and assemble evidence so moderation, appeals, and institutional review have a clearer record to work with.
Next step
Discuss how this workflow could fit your pilot.
If you want to explore how a structured viva-style workflow could fit your assessment process, register interest and we will follow up.